Careers
Part of Dental website marketing: what to keep and what to drop
How to vet dental website marketing case studies
How to judge dental website marketing case studies: the baseline, raw counts, costs, controls and limits a credible case must publish before you rely on it.
What to take away
- A dental case study transfers only when it shows the baseline, dates, raw counts, costs and limits.
- FTC enforcement actions teach control lessons about tracking and ad data, not dental growth results.
- Ask for the measurement method before you accept any published percentage.
- Real dental cases sit in ADA resources, trade press, regulator guidance and supplier libraries, and each one needs the same scrutiny.
A case study earns a place in your decision when a stranger could rerun the reasoning. That takes a published starting point, dates, raw counts, spend and limits. Anything less is a brochure with numbers. Use this checklist to vet dental website marketing case studies before comparing results. The dental website marketing fundamentals explain which levers a case can move, so read them before comparing results.
The fields a credible dental case study must show
Fields a credible case study must show
- Context
- Practice type, locations, services, capacity, market size
- Baseline
- Dates, raw counts, definitions, known data gaps
- Change
- Pages, routing, campaigns, forms, staff workflow
- Controls
- Other material changes in the same window
- Outcome
- Qualified contacts, bookings, operational result
- Cost
- Fees, media, tools, staff hours, remediation
- Risk
- Privacy, accessibility, claims, complaints
- Transfer limit
- What a different practice cannot assume
A percentage without a denominator is not evidence. Neither is a screenshot without a date. Ask how many calls or forms existed before, how qualified was defined, and who did the counting.
Example: one intake record, written to be checkable
One intake record, checkable
- Fix the windowstart and end dates, plus the quarter before as baseline.
- Record raw counts of inbound calls, forms, bookings, wrong-office calls and no-shows.
- List every change inside the window, including staffing, schedule, offers and campaigns.
- Publish costsagency fees, media spend, tools and internal hours.
- State what the result cannot prove.
Assume a two-office practice logged 1,200 inbound calls in one quarter and 280 of them reached the wrong office. After location cues were corrected on the profile and the site header, wrong-office calls fell to 96. Those figures are placeholders, included to show the format rather than to predict your result.
Enforcement cases as control lessons, not dental results
The FTC's announcement on the BetterHelp health-data case describes allegations that email addresses, IP addresses and questionnaire answers reached advertising platforms after privacy promises. BetterHelp is not a dental practice, so copy the control question, not the facts.
Ask what your own site sends. A brief should list every form field, tag, script, recipient, purpose, retention period and deletion path. Stated privacy language has to match the implemented system. Hidden tracking scripts are the usual gap between the two, and that article shows how to find them.
The FTC's GoodRx action covers comparable ground in prescription pricing. Read both as evidence that ad data flows need a map. Neither tells you anything about dental demand.
Where to find dental website marketing case studies
Few dental cases are published with a full method. Start with the ADA Center for Professional Success, Dental Economics and Dentaltown, where practice owners describe what they changed.
Then widen out. State and provincial association sessions, component dental society meetings and local study clubs often produce better detail than any website, because a peer can be questioned on the spot.
In Canada, check the Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario advertising guidance and Advertising Standards Canada before repeating any claim in that market.
Filter hard. Ask for the market size, the baseline period, the tools in use and whether the author had a commercial interest in the result.
Supplier libraries and Google Business Profile Help are worth reading with the table above open. So is our own file: two dental ad stories put one failed whitening claim beside one working test, which beats a page of wins.
Claims, reviews and the rules that apply
The FTC advertising substantiation policy requires a reasonable basis for objective claims before they are disseminated. The standard applies to testimonials and case summaries as much as to headline claims.
The FTC guidance on soliciting and paying for reviews covers fake feedback, selective requests, conditioned incentives and undisclosed relationships. Reviews about treatment sit beside advertising rules. Patient privacy law limits how you reply to them.
Treat every published case as a lead to test. Separate provider claims from measured records, note the product version and the study population, and reproduce one material claim with local data first. A claim that survives that test is worth acting on.
Before you copy a figure, check whether the comparison base is sound. dental website marketing benchmarks lists the four things to verify before you trust a number.
Common questions
Can a non-dental case study teach a dental practice anything?
Yes, when the lesson is a control, such as how ad platforms receive data. Name the differences in entity, law, audience and workflow, then stop there.
What numbers must a dental case include?
Dates, definitions, raw counts, denominators, costs and the operational outcome. A percentage on its own cannot be checked.
Can a supplier publish a client case without naming the client?
Yes, with written permission and a privacy review. Anonymous cases still need verifiable evidence behind them.
Where should a practice start if it has no case of its own?
Run one 90-day intake audit and write it up in the same format you would demand from a vendor.
